Water report · not indexed
What is in the water at 29036
3 public water systems serve this ZIP code in the federal records. Everything below comes from EPA monitoring data, and everything missing is named.
AMICKS FERRY WTR SYSTEM (SC3250077)
PWSID SC3250077 · SC · serves 3,671 people · service area inferred by a model, not supplied by the state
PFAS and lithium
5 compounds detected at or above the reporting limit under EPA’s UCMR 5 monitoring, across 15 samples.
| Compound | Highest detected | Samples | Most recent |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA | 0.01 µg/L | 4 | 7/24/2023 |
| PFOS | 0.0076 µg/L | 2 | 2/13/2024 |
| HFPO-DA | 0.0072 µg/L | 4 | 7/24/2023 |
| PFHxA | 0.0051 µg/L | 4 | 7/24/2023 |
| PFOA | 0.0046 µg/L | 1 | 1/10/2023 |
A detection is a measurement, not a violation and not a health finding. EPA states that UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with any limit.
Health-based violations
No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.
Hardness
No hardness measurement. Hardness is measured at environmental monitoring stations, and none fell inside this system’s service area. That is a gap in where monitoring happens, not a finding about the water.
NEWBERRY CO W&SA (3620002)
PWSID SC3620002 · SC · serves 9,941 people
PFAS and lithium
5 compounds detected at or above the reporting limit under EPA’s UCMR 5 monitoring, across 15 samples.
| Compound | Highest detected | Samples | Most recent |
|---|---|---|---|
| HFPO-DA | 0.0097 µg/L | 4 | 9/11/2024 |
| PFOS | 0.0081 µg/L | 4 | 9/11/2024 |
| PFOA | 0.0048 µg/L | 2 | 9/11/2024 |
| PFPeA | 0.004 µg/L | 2 | 9/11/2024 |
| PFHxA | 0.0038 µg/L | 3 | 9/11/2024 |
A detection is a measurement, not a violation and not a health finding. EPA states that UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with any limit.
Health-based violations
No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.
Hardness
We do not state a hardness for any system, and this is why. Hardness here would come from environmental monitoring stations that happen to sit inside your water system’s service area. We checked that method against the figures twenty large utilities publish about their own supply: it agreed with the utility fewer than half the time, and where it was wrong it usually read HIGH. Cities supplied from a distant watershed came off worst, because the stations end up sampling local groundwater nobody drinks. We are paid a referral fee when somebody asks for an installer, so a number that overstates hardness is the last error we are willing to publish. Your utility publishes its own hardness in its annual water quality report, and that figure is the one to trust.
COLUMBIA CITY OF (SC4010001)
PWSID SC4010001 · SC · serves 319,500 people
PFAS and lithium
7 compounds detected at or above the reporting limit under EPA’s UCMR 5 monitoring, across 38 samples.
| Compound | Highest detected | Samples | Most recent |
|---|---|---|---|
| HFPO-DA | 0.0092 µg/L | 5 | 9/23/2025 |
| PFOS | 0.0086 µg/L | 6 | 9/23/2025 |
| PFOA | 0.0069 µg/L | 6 | 9/23/2025 |
| PFPeA | 0.0068 µg/L | 8 | 9/23/2025 |
| PFHxA | 0.0057 µg/L | 8 | 9/23/2025 |
| PFBS | 0.0052 µg/L | 4 | 9/23/2025 |
| PFHpA | 0.003 µg/L | 1 | 9/23/2025 |
A detection is a measurement, not a violation and not a health finding. EPA states that UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with any limit.
Health-based violations
No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.
Hardness
We do not state a hardness for any system, and this is why. Hardness here would come from environmental monitoring stations that happen to sit inside your water system’s service area. We checked that method against the figures twenty large utilities publish about their own supply: it agreed with the utility fewer than half the time, and where it was wrong it usually read HIGH. Cities supplied from a distant watershed came off worst, because the stations end up sampling local groundwater nobody drinks. We are paid a referral fee when somebody asks for an installer, so a number that overstates hardness is the last error we are willing to publish. Your utility publishes its own hardness in its annual water quality report, and that figure is the one to trust.
What this report cannot tell you
Every figure describes water at a sampling point: a treatment plant, an entry point to the distribution system, or a monitoring station. None of it describes water arriving at your tap. Plumbing between the two can add lead and copper, and if your home was built before 1986 a test kit tells you something no federal dataset can.
Sources: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence (final release, frozen July 2026) · EPA SDWIS health-based violations · USGS and state monitoring via the Water Quality Portal · EPA Public Water System Service Area Boundaries v3. Compiled 2026-09-01 · 1 of 3 service areas here are modelled.