WaterCompared

Water report · not indexed

What is in the water at 63025

4 public water systems serve this ZIP code in the federal records. Everything below comes from EPA monitoring data, and everything missing is named.

MO AMERICAN EUREKA

PWSID MO6010258 · MO · serves 11,000 people · service area inferred by a model, not supplied by the state

PFAS and lithium

1 compound detected at or above the reporting limit under EPA’s UCMR 5 monitoring, across 12 samples.

CompoundHighest detectedSamplesMost recent
lithium220 µg/L126/21/2024

A detection is a measurement, not a violation and not a health finding. EPA states that UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with any limit.

Health-based violations

No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.

Hardness

No hardness measurement. Hardness is measured at environmental monitoring stations, and none fell inside this system’s service area. That is a gap in where monitoring happens, not a finding about the water.

MO AMERICAN ST LOUIS ST CHARLES COUNTIES

PWSID MO6010716 · MO · serves 1,100,000 people

PFAS and lithium

2 compounds detected at or above the reporting limit under EPA’s UCMR 5 monitoring, across 18 samples.

CompoundHighest detectedSamplesMost recent
lithium87 µg/L169/11/2024
PFBA0.0051 µg/L26/17/2024

A detection is a measurement, not a violation and not a health finding. EPA states that UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with any limit.

Health-based violations

No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.

Hardness

Median hardness 331 mg/L as CaCO₃, measured at 29 stations serving this system across 260 results, 2015-01-14 to 2026-02-23. Measured in the water source and distribution area, not at a tap, and not in your home.

JEFFERSON COUNTY PWSD 2

PWSID MO6024293 · MO · serves 16,548 people

PFAS and lithium

Sampled, nothing detected. Tested for 30 compounds under UCMR 5 with none found at or above its reporting limit. A reporting limit is the lowest concentration the method can measure, so this means “below that” rather than “zero”.

Health-based violations

No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.

Hardness

No hardness measurement. Hardness is measured at environmental monitoring stations, and none fell inside this system’s service area. That is a gap in where monitoring happens, not a finding about the water.

JEFFERSON COUNTY PWSD 6

PWSID MO6024298 · MO · serves 7,500 people

PFAS and lithium

2 compounds detected at or above the reporting limit under EPA’s UCMR 5 monitoring, across 6 samples.

CompoundHighest detectedSamplesMost recent
lithium60 µg/L56/12/2023
PFPeA0.0039 µg/L16/12/2023

A detection is a measurement, not a violation and not a health finding. EPA states that UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with any limit.

Health-based violations

No open health-based violation on record. This covers MCL, treatment technique and MRDL violations in SDWIS that have not been returned to compliance. It excludes monitoring and reporting violations, which are the large majority nationally, so this is not “no violations”, and SDWIS completeness varies by state.

Hardness

No hardness measurement. Hardness is measured at environmental monitoring stations, and none fell inside this system’s service area. That is a gap in where monitoring happens, not a finding about the water.

What this report cannot tell you

Every figure describes water at a sampling point: a treatment plant, an entry point to the distribution system, or a monitoring station. None of it describes water arriving at your tap. Plumbing between the two can add lead and copper, and if your home was built before 1986 a test kit tells you something no federal dataset can.

Sources: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence (final release, frozen July 2026) · EPA SDWIS health-based violations · USGS and state monitoring via the Water Quality Portal · EPA Public Water System Service Area Boundaries v3. Compiled 2026-09-01 · 1 of 4 service areas here are modelled.